Compare · Honest Read

AllometryvsServiceTitan

Different layer of the stack. ServiceTitan manages field operations (dispatch · scheduling · invoicing). Allometry underwrites the commercial decisions before resources commit. One records what happened. The other decides what should happen.

TL;DR
Most asset-heavy operators end up with both. ServiceTitan for execution. Allometry for underwriting. If you're running field ops today, ServiceTitan is probably fine. If you're quoting blind, bleeding margin, and discovering the damage at month-end — that's the Allometry problem.
The Core Claim

Different layer. Different question.

ServiceTitan is a best-in-class Field Service Management (FSM) platform. Its job: make the field work flow. Dispatch, scheduling, invoicing, tech tools. Allometry is the underwriting and control layer. Its job: decide whether the work is worth doing, at what price, and with what risk — before the field work starts.

Workflow · FSM Layer

Manages the field.

Observes and coordinates what happens on the ground. Best-in-class for dispatching techs, scheduling installs, invoicing customers. 4,000+ employees; public since 2025.

  • Dispatch & technician routing
  • Scheduling & install windows
  • Invoicing & payment capture
  • Customer CRM for field ops
  • Tech mobile app & service history
  • Reporting on what already happened
Underwriting · Control Layer

Governs the decision.

Scores every commercial decision (quote, target, expansion) against margin and enterprise value at the address level — before resources commit. Runs upstream of FSM execution.

  • Address-level margin & EV scoring
  • Quote-time cost floor enforcement
  • Account Pulse · one score per account
  • Portfolio & vendor risk detection
  • Compliance & approval gates
  • Governs what should happen next
Where in the Stack

We sit above ServiceTitan, not beside it.

Think of it as a cake: underwriting at the top decides what ships down to execution. ServiceTitan is the execution layer that turns a green-lit deployment into field reality. Most of our operators plan to keep their FSM.

Underwrite
Allometry — score the account, enforce the margin floor, gate the approval, allocate resources. Decide whether to deploy.
Quote → API
Allometry writes the approved quote + work order. Hands off to FSM via webhook or direct integration.
Execute
ServiceTitan (or Jobber, FieldEdge, ERP) — dispatch the tech, install the asset, invoice the customer. Make it happen.
Job close → Pulse
Realized margin, actual cost, timing variance — flows back to Allometry. Every closed job retrains the Pulse.
Head to Head

What each platform actually does.

  ServiceTitan Allometry
Dispatch & technician routing Best-in-class
Install schedulingAsset Intelligence module
Invoicing & payment
Tech mobile app
Customer service historyper-address · via Asset Intel
Address-level margin scoring Core
Quote-time cost floor enforcement Core
Account Pulse (continuous EV score) Core
Account-based outbound targeting Outbound ABM
Portfolio risk & concentration flags Risk Scoring
Vendor & supply-chain intelligence Vendor Intel
Compliance & audit trail (Law 25 / GDPR / SOC 2)partial Compliance module
Humanoid-ready API abstraction Platform P2
Reporting on what happened Analytics layer
Decides what should happen The whole point
The Honest Take

Who should use what.

We don't want to be your FSM. If ServiceTitan is working for you on dispatch, scheduling, and invoicing — great. Keep it. Here's how we think about the split:

Use Allometry (no FSM yet)

Spreadsheets + gut

You quote on instinct. Margin discovered at month-end. No FSM. Allometry alone gets you margin protection + address-level scoring. Add ServiceTitan later when dispatch becomes the bottleneck.

Use both

Most asset-heavy operators

You have ServiceTitan (or Jobber, FieldEdge). Field ops run fine. Margin still leaks. Add Allometry on top — it reads cost/job/account data from FSM, underwrites commercial decisions, writes approved quotes back.

Stay ServiceTitan (no Allometry)

Field ops-heavy, margin stable

If your margin is predictable, your cost model is clean, and your coordination bottleneck is truly dispatch (not quoting), ServiceTitan alone may suffice. We won't pretend we're the better fit.

Proof It Works

JWG Palettes: +12.4 margin points in 30 days.

Quebec pallet manufacturer. They had their field ops under control. What they didn't have: address-level margin visibility before the job started. 47 jobs underwritten through the Pulse took their blended margin from ~11% to 23.4% in a single month — zero extra headcount, zero new field-ops tooling.

Read the full case study →

Keep ServiceTitan. Add the underwriting layer.

If you run field operations and your margin varies wildly by address, quote accuracy is the leak. We fix that layer — ServiceTitan handles the rest.

Book a Demo → See the full OS